2022 Satisfaction Surveys
In the 2021-2022 academic year, a satisfaction survey was carried out among students of Phases 2-5 through the University's remote access system and face to face among students of Phases 1 and 6.
The Phase 6 table in this document is identical to the Phase 6 table in the 2020-2021 report, so it is not summarised again here.
Student satisfaction: Phase 1
The value given for each area is the share of students who responded positively to the statements in that area.
Phase | Respondents | Learning environment | Living environment | Programmes and teaching | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase 1 | 266 | 82.2% | 55.2% | 70.4% | 86.1% |
Notable statements
Phase 1: highest "Student representatives take part in faculty boards and committees" 89.8%; lowest "The physical conditions for classes (cleanliness, lighting, ventilation) are good" 25.9%
Student satisfaction during remote education
Phase | Respondents | Overall satisfaction with remote education (1-5) |
|---|---|---|
Phase 2-5 | 99 | 3.84 |
Most positively rated statements (positive answers)
The content of remotely delivered classes was consistent with the curriculum 94.9%
The duration of remotely delivered classes was adequate 93.1%
When I could not attend a class, I was able to access the course materials afterwards 90.9%
Lowest rated statements (positive answers)
I can easily reach the relevant administrative staff 44.4%
The technical infrastructure of our university's system (video/audio quality, connection quality, etc.) was suitable for remote access 51.5%
I think the exams held remotely assessed us objectively 69.7%
Documents
You can download the original survey reports (in Turkish) from the links below.
2021-2022 Student Satisfaction Survey report (DOCX, 40 KB)
Method note: in the student surveys, the satisfaction rate is the share of respondents who answered "partly agree", "agree" or "strongly agree" (or "agree" in two-column tables); area values are the mean of the statements in that area. This is the method used in the Faculty's own survey reports. Summary values not given in the documents were calculated from the response counts in the documents; small differences may arise from rounding in the originals.